Another look at climate change

The entire war against climate change to prevent the use of any carbon-based fuel is based on one single assumption: that carbon dioxide is the primary cause.

Yet the key scientific question that never even gets mentioned, let alone answered, is “how can any gas that occupies 4/100ths of 1 percent of our atmosphere have any effect at all?”

Meteorologists concur that the greenhouse gases in our atmosphere keep Earth about 59F (degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than otherwise. Water vapor, by far the strongest greenhouse gas, is 10 percent of our atmosphere. All of the other greenhouse gases taken together, including carbon dioxide, occupy less than 4.5/100th of 1 percent. Of the 59F, 58.73 is due to water vapor and only 0.27 percent to carbon dioxide and the others.

In parts per million (ppm) of our atmosphere, water vapor is 100,000 ppm and all the other greenhouse gases less than 450 ppm.

Think of a sports arena that holds 100,000 fans. There, in the center are 450 CO2 global warming fans. Surrounding them are 100,000 water vapor fans. Who is going to control the cheering?

In 1750 at the start of the industrial revolution, the amount of CO2 in our air was about 285 ppm. In 2015, at Mauna in Hawaii, it was 397. Assuming that this increase was all due to man’s use of carbon-based fuels (which it is not), and the rate of increase continues, the level will double to 800 in 1900 years (the year 3915).

Since the current global warmth due to CO2 now is 0.22F, by 3915 it will have increased to 0.54F, hardly a barnburner.

The issue is whether the Earth is warming. The study conducted by American, Russian and French scientists in 1999-2003 via extensive ice core drilling in the Vostosk Peninsula in the Antartica showed that Earth is nearing the end of a 24,000 year interglacial warming period. In the beginning, North America and much of the world was covered by huge glaciers. Now, although most of the ice is gone, the warming may continue for a few centuries more – a normal climate cycle, having almost nothing to do with CO2.

For the past 20-plus years, America has spent more than $1 trillion in the ferocious battle to prevent climate change. Isn’t it time we recognized the error?

– Jim Koubele

More in Letters to the Editor

Mayor needs to rescind her endorsement of Sen. Fain

In the Seattle Times, Mayor Nancy Backus wrote that she is a… Continue reading

We believe in Sen. Fain

In this day of instant communication with social media at our finger… Continue reading

Guilty until proven innocent

Under the shadow of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s case, I am a survivor… Continue reading

District 31 needs better representation

If the 31st District isn’t the laughingstock of the state, it deserves… Continue reading

Schrier will meet our needs

We have an opportunity this fall to elect Dr. Kim Schrier to… Continue reading

A vote for no control

As the political season comes into full swing, the campaigns focus us… Continue reading

Do your part: be informed, vote on time

Enough injustice. If you don’t like the way things in this country… Continue reading

’18 election: Rossi more equipped to work in Congress

If you want a strong leader in Congress who is a business… Continue reading

What do the citizens of Congressional District 8 stand for?

It was disappointing to see Dino Rossi (like Dave Reichert) avoid constituents… Continue reading

War memorial: Grateful for shrine in honor of veterans,

I went walking on the path at Les Gove Park last week… Continue reading

Congressional races: The right to choose is profound

In response to Roy Mauldin (“Schrier is a contradiction,” Reporter, Aug. 17),… Continue reading

Public safety: Wildfire codes needed to protect us

The recent brush fire burning up the West Hill, threatening homes should… Continue reading