Consider whom, what you are supporting

I support the letter, “We need to participate as voters, citizens” (Oct. 13, Kent Reporter) encouraging us to vote. My purpose is to encourage you to think about who and what you are voting for.

Who do you trust more, the government or the people? Many are calling for more government intrusion into our lives, believing that government is a better caretaker of our rights than ourselves or fellow men and women. Problem one is that, depending on the issue, government is likely to overreact.

Consider the latest law about using your mobile phone in the car and the over-reaching of the rest of that law, or the Dodd-Frank Act. Second problem is, government is all about power. Typically, the more power one has, the more they abuse it.

Have you noticed that for politicians, most of them, it is party first and doing what’s right, fair and just comes somewhere down the list? In between are the people who provide big money for the politicians to stay in power. Simplified, that may be businesses, unions and special interest groups. I recently reached out to my three state legislators. Only one responded. So much for government responsiveness to the ordinary guy.

Government has a role, I’m not saying it doesn’t. It is to protect its citizens at home and abroad, enforce the laws for the mutual benefit of all, provide equal justice, provide a fair playing field and do the things that we individually can’t do, like build roads and infrastructure. However, once the government has taxed your hard labor, you have very little say in how they spend it.

It is important to vote for people who will spend your money the way you would. Once that money is gone, it’s out of your control. For those who think government is a better steward of your money than the free market consider this: in the free market you decide who gets your money.

If you don’t like something, you don’t buy it. If you don’t need it, you don’t buy it. If you think the price is too high, you don’t buy it. If you don’t like a company’s policies, you don’t shop there.

It appears we live in a time of pet projects and causes. Are you willing to impose on others’ rights just to impose your pet cause on all? We need a broader vision. There are always what economist call “opportunity costs.” There are always consequences to our choices, things we get, things we give up. What side of the coin are you going to land on? How are you going to vote?

– Adam Self

More in Letters to the Editor

Chuck Booth was a special, giving person

Chuck Booth worked for the Auburn School District at the same time… Continue reading

Auburn is growing too quickly

I’ve lived in Auburn for about 40 years now and it has… Continue reading

A home is a human right, not a privilege

What an instrumental step the city of Auburn has taken by hiring… Continue reading

Other weapons, woes confront us

As the most restrictive gun law in the nation goes in to… Continue reading

Paying too much

Opening the July 12 edition of the Opinion page, I was surprised… Continue reading

Vote yes for King County Proposition 1

As an avid bicyclist and hiker, I find it more and more… Continue reading

Let’s defuse fireworks

The fireworks law is a joke. Sure glad us taxpayers paid for… Continue reading

Fun on the Fourth?

The Fourth of July should be fun for everyone, if only the… Continue reading

Enough is enough

This is a very serious problem, and the mayor should be doing… Continue reading

Yes, Elfers is off the mark

I totally agree with what Joe Marks wrote in his letter, on… Continue reading

Does loading the nation with guns make it safer?

I find it telling that Mr. Malinski’s May 24 letter (“Stricter gun… Continue reading

Time to act is now to save our planet

“Time is now to embrace Green New Deal” (June 7, Kent Reporter)… Continue reading