Why discipline Wales?

I agree wholeheartedly with City Councilman Bill Peloza’s recent comments in the March 30 Auburn Reporter, that the press is fanning and promoting discord amongst an already stressed City Council. This week-by-week progressive commentary is motivating controversy over an item that doesn’t even deserve a footnote of acknowledgement.

From reviewing the meeting video it was clear that Mayor Nancy Backus, chair of the meeting, acknowledged Council member Largo Wales, who was then immediately interrupted by council member John Holman, to exercise a point of order, which he alleged Wales was in violation of. After the out-of-order infraction was explained by Holman, Backus then again recognized Wales, who said that her only intention was to actually thank Holman for the clarification that he’d just provided to the budgetary motion for ordinance No. 6679, which was at hand … very polite and collegial for someone who’d just gotten verbally slapped by the person she was attempting to compliment.

Then I tried to listen for the alleged following expletive. I replayed that period three times, increasing the volume each time, and finally, with my volume on full did I hear something that might have been said by Wales. The business then continued with a vote on the ordinance, and no reference by any member was made to anything that Wales had allegedly uttered, nor did I find any reference to the “comment” in the minutes of the meeting.

So I have two questions that the Auburn Reporter neglected to reveal. What was allegedly said, and who filed an official complaint that has caused any need for disciplinary action?

According to Robert’s Rules of Order, revised 1996, Section VII Item 43 addressing Decorum in Debate: “Disorderly words should be taken down by the member who objects to them, or by the secretary, and then read to the member. If he denies them, the assembly shall decide by a vote whether they are his words or not. If a member cannot justify the words he used, and will not suitably apologize for using them, it is the duty of the assembly to act in the case.”

Therefore, whatever under-the-breath, derogatory comment that Wales, in frustration made, should have been immediately addressed, with a suggested apology, and not allowed to fester, fanned by antagonist reporting.

According to Roberts Rules, which our esteemed reporter says is the basis for the conduct of City Council meetings, the due process of addressing this “issue” had passed, and in lieu of any disciplinary action, an apology by Wales to Holman for the use of profanity (which there is actually no record of) should be accepted, and end this matter now.

The council has much more pressing issues to manage. It must be a really slow news cycle if this matter is the focus of reporting, or there is a less than subtle attempt to diminish Wales.

– Mark Flanery

More in Letters to the Editor

Trump is making America great again

Though not exactly word for word, but point by point, I agree… Continue reading

Brighter side of Trump

I agreed with much of a previous letter writer telling us how… Continue reading

Why not investigate Joe Fain rape accusation?

The last two Auburn Reporters reported about the investigation into the rape… Continue reading

Auburn needs to rebuild its downtown core

What to do with the iconic Auburn Avenue Theater? Bulldoze it and… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Thanks to Gilbert and all that he does for others

Thank you for doing a story on the very deserving Curt Gilbert… Continue reading

Race for Congress: Fresh Face vis-a-vis Old Pol

Electing Kim Schrier will bring to the office “pluses” sorely needed in… Continue reading

Don’t be misled, vote yes on I-1631

Let’s dig into the “special interests” that wrote and support I-1631. These… Continue reading

Dino has my vote for Congress

Watching the debate between Dino Rossi and Kim Schrier on YouTube was… Continue reading

I-1639 is a bad law that attacks our rights

If you value your civil rights, then please vote no on I-1639.… Continue reading

I-1631 Opponents do not care about you or your family

In the Auburn Reporter, Don Brunell wrote a piece, “Carbon fee hurts… Continue reading