Letters to the Editor

Privatizing liquor sales poses problems

The two initiatives pertaining to the state Liquor Control Board, 1-1100 (Costco-supported) and I-1105 (supported by booze distributors) would cost the state and local governments as much as $730 million over the next five years — this, according to the non-partisan OFM budget analysis.

Not only would the initiatives cause the firing of nearly 1,000 people, it also would create a public safety nightmare. Liquor sales and consumption will rise drastically, liquor outlets will increase by 1,000 percent (from 300 to 3,300, at least); minors will gain more access to alcohol (current data shows state liquor stores with a no-sales-to-minors compliance rate of 95 percent versus 76 percent for the private sector — a 400-percent increase in sales to minors).

Local police and fire departments will see cuts to their services (18.8 percent of LCB profits went to fund local law enforcement, $62.6 million in 2009); Washington's Basic Health program also will see significant cuts, leading to more people unable to obtain health coverage (14.9 percent or $49.4 million of liquor profits in 2009 went to fund health services in Washington, according to state data).

With so many downsides to these initiatives, it's really a no-brainer. Vote no on I-1100 & I-1105 when you fill out your ballot. Think about the consequences and vote for progress for Washington state, not for corporate profits.

– Robert Kramer, Vote Progress Washington, PAC

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jul 25 edition online now. Browse the archives.