Unfavorably buzzing?


October 27, 2009 · 7:12 PM

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

When reporting on the Oct. 15 mayoral debate, Robert Whale wrote, "Haugen also created a fair amount of unfavorable buzz by scowling, grinning unaccountably, fidgeting constantly and even removing a shoe." I attended the debate; the conduct of both candidates was appropriate and decorous. It would not have occurred to me to insult either one. Also, the audience was well-behaved, not "unfavorably buzzing."

Mr. Whale's negative description would have been more appropriately placed on the editorial page. His colored observations (or opinions), in a front page news article, were inappropriate and unprofessional. We readers can all figure out where he would cast his vote. Really, we should not be able to discern his preference from a front page news article.

The Auburn Reporter, which invited Virginia Haugen to participate in an impartial debate setting, then reported with obvious bias, owes Ms. Haugen, the audience and the readers an apology.

– Val Erickson

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus