Let’s clarify the federal budget process

Regarding Mr. Valentine’s letter (“Shame on us for bringing aboard Trump,” Feb. 8, Auburn Reporter):

Ironically, on Valentine’s day, I will be 83, so Mr. Valentine is my senior. I remember all the presidents since Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I minored in government in college, and I find Mr. Valentine’s comment that President Trump didn’t know that the origin of the yearly budget is the House of Representatives to be ludicrous. Actually, the executive branch submits a proposed budget to Congress, and it is typically called DOA (dead on arrival). Congress and the legislative branch at every level of our government has historically been the least responsible branch of our three branches of government.

Congress is responsible to pass the budget out of both houses and present it to the president to sign or veto. That has not happened.

Those who say the president shut the government down are wrong. The president hasn’t been required to take an action because Congress has not agreed on a budget to present to the president. In recent years, Congress has never produced a budget on time.

Continuing resolutions are not budgets. Congresspersons do not take their responsibility seriously. At least 60 days before the budget is due, Congress should remain in session 12 hours per day, seven days per week until they have a budget agreed by both houses to present to the president. Vacations and foreign trips should be prohibited. Any foreign trip by a Congressperson should be at their personal expense (no lobbyist money). Any such trip by a Congressperson is personal and does not represent the U.S. government. We have only one foreign policy, which is established by the president and the State Department.

President Trump is probably the most qualified president in our history. He has been an executive officer for nearly 50 years, mostly as the chief executive officer. President Obama, having no executive experience, was probably the least qualified. Even as a legislator he dodged tough decisions by voting present, rather than make a decision. That behavior should disqualify any such person from an executive position.

– William Malinski

More in Letters to the Editor

Auburn’s caring neighbors

I was born and raised in Darrington. Good neighbors were – and… Continue reading

City Council, mayor at fault for budgetary problems

How in the world in this booming economy can the budget for… Continue reading

Trump the president

Your recent letter writer who declared Donald Trump “the most competent president… Continue reading

Let’s clarify the federal budget process

Regarding Mr. Valentine’s letter (“Shame on us for bringing aboard Trump,” Feb.… Continue reading

Consider crime-free zones

The state Legislature is considering expansion of gun-free zones and many other… Continue reading

Wanted: a better president

Kudos to Harold Valentine for his well written letter in the Feb.… Continue reading

Shame on us for bringing aboard Trump

I am 90 years old. I have voted in every presidential election… Continue reading

Proposed bills threaten business for hairdressers, salon owners

Intermediary employees. Contributing agents. Worker wage boards. This is the gobbledygook that… Continue reading

Gov. Inslee, you’re not the right fit for president

Gov. Jay Inslee, cool your jets. You are not presidential material. Let’s… Continue reading

‘National wealth tax’ doesn’t add up to a solution

In response to last week’s letter calling for a “national wealth tax:”… Continue reading

Inslee: tend to ‘our Washington’

Washington is last in earthquake preparedness. It is near the top in… Continue reading

National Wealth Tax would help pay for all

Here is the big problem for Democrats: The Republicans are correct when… Continue reading