More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21), one sentence stuck out.

“Sullivan, Fain and Hargrove have suggested that lawmakers focus more on comprehensive mental health bills than gun regulations.”

First, I’ve been in the mental health system. I’ve served in the military. I’ve worked for city government, and as such with law enforcement and others.

I have one simple question, “What would you not do to save the life of your child?” Not the unreasonable, the outlandish, but the possible. Where would you draw the line?

When it comes to senseless, preventable gun violence, safety, control, whatever you choose to call it, we seem to have a national myopia that tells us we can look at almost anything except the guns used, because, darn it, the Second Amendment.

I’m not a gun control fanatic. Neither am I a gun owner. But there’s more that can be done than just mental health. Mental health alone won’t resolve the problems associated with gun violence.

Maybe there were a lot of gun owners at that meeting. Those who firmly believe in their right to own a gun for the sake of hunting, of home protection.

Right now, people are dying. Children are dying. Senselessly. Needlessly, Violently. And we keep fighting ourselves into a corner of inadequate action.

So, again, I ask, what is it you would not be willing to do to save the life of your child?

That’s what the discussion feels like.

Me? I would do anything reasonable, feasible. I would rule nothing out if it had a real chance at saving the life of my child, my wife, or yours.

There’s got to be a way to meet in the middle, where sensible legislation can be enacted to do something more than just treat every/anything else but the weapons used.

And there ought to be a way to address that in a way that also protects and preserves the rights of gun owners.

This really shouldn’t be an either/or.

If it were my child, it wouldn’t be.

Ok, let’s try “mental health,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else, “but,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else.

Sooner or later, we’ll run out of “buts.”

And when that day comes, let’s have the conversation we could’ve started with. One that includes doing something about the weapons of choice.

Always a “shooter,” Always a “gun.”

– Mike Moore

More in Letters to the Editor

National Wealth Tax would help pay for all

Here is the big problem for Democrats: The Republicans are correct when… Continue reading

Seriously, your view is skewed

Regarding: “Presenting a view from the right” (Reporter, letters to the editor,… Continue reading

Casting a dim shadow over Trump

Regarding the Nov. 30 “Brighter Side of Trump” letter: the policies of… Continue reading

Presenting a view from the right

You should hear from a Trump supporter now and then just to:… Continue reading

Trump is making America great again

Though not exactly word for word, but point by point, I agree… Continue reading

Brighter side of Trump

I agreed with much of a previous letter writer telling us how… Continue reading

Why not investigate Joe Fain rape accusation?

The last two Auburn Reporters reported about the investigation into the rape… Continue reading

Auburn needs to rebuild its downtown core

What to do with the iconic Auburn Avenue Theater? Bulldoze it and… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Thanks to Gilbert and all that he does for others

Thank you for doing a story on the very deserving Curt Gilbert… Continue reading

Race for Congress: Fresh Face vis-a-vis Old Pol

Electing Kim Schrier will bring to the office “pluses” sorely needed in… Continue reading