More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21), one sentence stuck out.

“Sullivan, Fain and Hargrove have suggested that lawmakers focus more on comprehensive mental health bills than gun regulations.”

First, I’ve been in the mental health system. I’ve served in the military. I’ve worked for city government, and as such with law enforcement and others.

I have one simple question, “What would you not do to save the life of your child?” Not the unreasonable, the outlandish, but the possible. Where would you draw the line?

When it comes to senseless, preventable gun violence, safety, control, whatever you choose to call it, we seem to have a national myopia that tells us we can look at almost anything except the guns used, because, darn it, the Second Amendment.

I’m not a gun control fanatic. Neither am I a gun owner. But there’s more that can be done than just mental health. Mental health alone won’t resolve the problems associated with gun violence.

Maybe there were a lot of gun owners at that meeting. Those who firmly believe in their right to own a gun for the sake of hunting, of home protection.

Right now, people are dying. Children are dying. Senselessly. Needlessly, Violently. And we keep fighting ourselves into a corner of inadequate action.

So, again, I ask, what is it you would not be willing to do to save the life of your child?

That’s what the discussion feels like.

Me? I would do anything reasonable, feasible. I would rule nothing out if it had a real chance at saving the life of my child, my wife, or yours.

There’s got to be a way to meet in the middle, where sensible legislation can be enacted to do something more than just treat every/anything else but the weapons used.

And there ought to be a way to address that in a way that also protects and preserves the rights of gun owners.

This really shouldn’t be an either/or.

If it were my child, it wouldn’t be.

Ok, let’s try “mental health,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else, “but,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else.

Sooner or later, we’ll run out of “buts.”

And when that day comes, let’s have the conversation we could’ve started with. One that includes doing something about the weapons of choice.

Always a “shooter,” Always a “gun.”

– Mike Moore

More in Letters to the Editor

Wasting taxpayers’ money on a worn-down venue

It’s come to my attention that in the last seven years alone,… Continue reading

New school supports our kids’ futures

We had the opportunity to attend the Olympic Middle School groundbreaking ceremony… Continue reading

Gambling with safe path to casino

There are three perfectly safe intersections with signal lights to enter the… Continue reading

Thanks for the effort

I want to thank the City of Auburn and the construction crew… Continue reading

‘Crisis pregnancy centers’ pose problems

As a resident of Washington and King County for 37 years, I… Continue reading

Trump to the rescue?

The president’s braggadocious blustering, trivializing the horrifying shootings at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman… Continue reading

The wrong weapons; there’s more we can do

Your “letters” writers posited a strong belief that the solution to a… Continue reading

What do freedom, patriotism really mean?

In an effort to convince enough Americans to vote against their own… Continue reading

More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21),… Continue reading

Please give room, time for pedestrians

Rant to drivers like the one who almost hit me last night,… Continue reading

Thanks for the extra effort

I have been pleasantly surprised lately to see several Waste Management drivers… Continue reading

Vote no on fire charge measure

My ballot for the Feb. 13 special election for the Valley Regional… Continue reading