More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21), one sentence stuck out.

“Sullivan, Fain and Hargrove have suggested that lawmakers focus more on comprehensive mental health bills than gun regulations.”

First, I’ve been in the mental health system. I’ve served in the military. I’ve worked for city government, and as such with law enforcement and others.

I have one simple question, “What would you not do to save the life of your child?” Not the unreasonable, the outlandish, but the possible. Where would you draw the line?

When it comes to senseless, preventable gun violence, safety, control, whatever you choose to call it, we seem to have a national myopia that tells us we can look at almost anything except the guns used, because, darn it, the Second Amendment.

I’m not a gun control fanatic. Neither am I a gun owner. But there’s more that can be done than just mental health. Mental health alone won’t resolve the problems associated with gun violence.

Maybe there were a lot of gun owners at that meeting. Those who firmly believe in their right to own a gun for the sake of hunting, of home protection.

Right now, people are dying. Children are dying. Senselessly. Needlessly, Violently. And we keep fighting ourselves into a corner of inadequate action.

So, again, I ask, what is it you would not be willing to do to save the life of your child?

That’s what the discussion feels like.

Me? I would do anything reasonable, feasible. I would rule nothing out if it had a real chance at saving the life of my child, my wife, or yours.

There’s got to be a way to meet in the middle, where sensible legislation can be enacted to do something more than just treat every/anything else but the weapons used.

And there ought to be a way to address that in a way that also protects and preserves the rights of gun owners.

This really shouldn’t be an either/or.

If it were my child, it wouldn’t be.

Ok, let’s try “mental health,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else, “but,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else.

Sooner or later, we’ll run out of “buts.”

And when that day comes, let’s have the conversation we could’ve started with. One that includes doing something about the weapons of choice.

Always a “shooter,” Always a “gun.”

– Mike Moore

More in Letters to the Editor

Auburn schools: District health proposal involves gender identification K-12

I would like to make the public aware of upcoming school community… Continue reading

2018 elections: Dino Rossi owes an apology

The Sept. 7 issue of the Auburn Reporter included a letter by… Continue reading

War memorial: Grateful for shrine in honor of veterans,

I went walking on the path at Les Gove Park last week… Continue reading

Congressional races: The right to choose is profound

In response to Roy Mauldin (“Schrier is a contradiction,” Reporter, Aug. 17),… Continue reading

Public safety: Wildfire codes needed to protect us

The recent brush fire burning up the West Hill, threatening homes should… Continue reading

Washington needs Reichert’s vote on a farm bill that works for families

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – often called food stamps –… Continue reading

Hader can get the job done right

Trumpublican. I didn’t coin that word. I heard it on TV. It… Continue reading

Hader is the choice for Congress

The key questions voters hoping to flip the 8th District need to… Continue reading

Schrier is the best fit for Congress

Kim Schrier has my unequivocal support for Congressperson of Washington’s 8th Congressional… Continue reading

Wildfires out of control

When I was a young boy living in Ballard, I remember the… Continue reading

Fain gets things done across party lines

I am voting for Joe Fain for state senator from Auburn, Kent… Continue reading

Hader is the choice for Congress

I spent this past Fourth of July in my usual way: registering… Continue reading