More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21), one sentence stuck out.

“Sullivan, Fain and Hargrove have suggested that lawmakers focus more on comprehensive mental health bills than gun regulations.”

First, I’ve been in the mental health system. I’ve served in the military. I’ve worked for city government, and as such with law enforcement and others.

I have one simple question, “What would you not do to save the life of your child?” Not the unreasonable, the outlandish, but the possible. Where would you draw the line?

When it comes to senseless, preventable gun violence, safety, control, whatever you choose to call it, we seem to have a national myopia that tells us we can look at almost anything except the guns used, because, darn it, the Second Amendment.

I’m not a gun control fanatic. Neither am I a gun owner. But there’s more that can be done than just mental health. Mental health alone won’t resolve the problems associated with gun violence.

Maybe there were a lot of gun owners at that meeting. Those who firmly believe in their right to own a gun for the sake of hunting, of home protection.

Right now, people are dying. Children are dying. Senselessly. Needlessly, Violently. And we keep fighting ourselves into a corner of inadequate action.

So, again, I ask, what is it you would not be willing to do to save the life of your child?

That’s what the discussion feels like.

Me? I would do anything reasonable, feasible. I would rule nothing out if it had a real chance at saving the life of my child, my wife, or yours.

There’s got to be a way to meet in the middle, where sensible legislation can be enacted to do something more than just treat every/anything else but the weapons used.

And there ought to be a way to address that in a way that also protects and preserves the rights of gun owners.

This really shouldn’t be an either/or.

If it were my child, it wouldn’t be.

Ok, let’s try “mental health,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else, “but,” and when that’s not enough, let’s try something else.

Sooner or later, we’ll run out of “buts.”

And when that day comes, let’s have the conversation we could’ve started with. One that includes doing something about the weapons of choice.

Always a “shooter,” Always a “gun.”

– Mike Moore

More in Letters to the Editor

We need evidence, measures when considering car tab fee reduction

Most, if not all, state and local government programs can be tested.… Continue reading

Asking voters to support us

Mountain View Fire and Rescue is proud to provide fire and life… Continue reading

Auburn schools need the best; support levies

On Feb. 11, the Auburn School District has two very important replacement… Continue reading

Appreciate the support, acceptance of my service dog

Appreciate the support, acceptance of my service dog I would like to… Continue reading

Post Office delivers great service

I would like to comment on the excellent service provided by our… Continue reading

By George, he was right

To anyone closely following the congressional impeachment fiasco, one point clearly stands… Continue reading

We need to change the course

The Neanderthals were a communal and peaceful people. They would have most… Continue reading

Think before you welcome home a puppy

Don’t buy holiday puppy until you do your research. With the holidays… Continue reading

We need to support the fight against diseases

The recent tuberculosis exposure in Auburn reminds us that this disease is… Continue reading

Trial was about drug trade

Regarding Irma Fritz’s column, “Experience as juror tugs at heart of a… Continue reading

Thank you for the opportunity to serve

I want to thank everyone who voted in this election, I feel… Continue reading

Will the courts supplant the vote?

I read with interest the commentary by Jerry Cornfield in the Nov.… Continue reading